The naked King Lear

- Episode 03 -

Shakespeare and the Groundlings

The naked King Lear
22 April 2026
All History Café links
Shakespeare and the Groundlings
It was a time of unprecedented failed harvests. So Shakespeare takes his audience on the journey with King Lear. See what it would be like if it was you who found yourself out of house and home, cold and hoping someone would give you their cloak
Poster for Lear, Sheffield Crucible

This afternoon in 1606, when we arrive with all the crowd at the Globe, we notice the sign for the first time. Totus mundus agit histrionem. Not many of us read Latin. But it means everyone’s an actor. We’re all in this together.
 
Today’s play is The Tragedy of King Lear. The first actors are on stage. One is obviously the king – must be Lear. Apparently he’s going to abdicate and give himself up to pleasure, especially hunting. He will divide his kingdom up between two of his daughters married to the Dukes of Albany and Gloucester and visit his two daughters’ houses monthly.

But, wait a moment, those are the names of the sons of King James I. Albany and Gloucester. Well we all know what that’s all about.

King James arrived in England from Scotland in 1603 and immediately announced he would unite the two kingdoms into one. He lectured Parliament – at great length – that Britain was the body and he was the head. And no head could have two bodies. Then Parliament shot the king’s proposal down with a great deal of insulting words directed at the dirty and greedy Scots. It’s a story we tell in our series on the Gunpowder Plot.

The link to Lear is all the more obvious to us Groundlings because Lear’s two elder daughters are married to the Duke of Albany (who in 1606 is James’s elder son) and the Duke of Cornwall (the sickly younger brother). And another thing we all know is that James spends almost his entire time out of London, hunting. He leaves running his kingdom to Robert Cecil and anyone who can bear to work with the man. Few can.


#121 The naked King Lear - Ep 3 Shakespeare and the Groundlings
 






 
Bethlem (Bedlam) hospital rebuilt after the Fire of London 1666, at Moorfields

However, as the play goes on we find that Lear’s retirement plan runs into trouble.

His daughters Goneril and Reagan, having taken possession of their shares of the kingdom, want nothing to do with their pleasure-loving father and his retinue of bawdy supporters. In fact, to everyone’s amazement, the king finds himself on the road as a down-and-out vagrant.

And so does Edgar, the son of Lear’s loyal noble friend, the Earl of Gloucester. Now the audience is gripped. Being homeless, on the road, is one thing we all dread almost as much as the plague. 400 plus years later in England, Scotland and Wales people say that we are all only three steps away from being on the streets. Back in 1606 it could take as little as a bout of serious illness.

Edgar, who is in fear of his life because of a complicated subplot,  disguises himself by calling himself ‘Tom O’Bedlam.’ Now the audience is laughing. We all know about Tom’O’Bedlam. He is a stock figure. The poor of Bedlam – Bethlehem hospital in Bishopsgate – are often people with psychiatric disorders, written off in the days before modern medicine as ‘insane.’ Inmates at Bethlehem hospital, as at any other, can be licensed to beg on the streets.

But during the course of Elizabeth’s reign disreputable anti-disability propaganda declared that beggars claiming to be mad were usually phoney. They went about with a stock repertoire of mad behaviour – the torn clothes and the sharp objects they stick into themselves. They’re often called ‘Poor Tom.

In the play Edgar repeats the refrain ‘poor Tom is a-cold.’ But instead of giving him a cloak, he is whipped, thrown in the stocks and imprisoned. It’s what anti-disability campaigners wanted to see.
The naked King Lear

 

Flemish engraving c 1592 called The Poor Kitchen, Theodore de Bry

Eventually Lear and his ragged comrades end up sheltering from a storm in a beggar’s hovel.

And there they discover Edgar (poor Tom) who is so wretched that not even his father recognises him. Lear sees how much Tom is suffering and offers him his own cloak. ‘Poor naked wretches, whereso’er you are,’ says Lear. ‘That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm, How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides, Your looped and windowed raggedness, defend you from seasons such as these?’
 
And then, in a striking moment, we hear Lear working it all out. He’s saying what we are all thinking. ‘O, I have ta’en too little care of this! Take physic, pomp; Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel, That thou mayst shake the superflux to them, And show the heavens more just.’ 

We see Lear imagining a magistrate who is giving a poor man a hard time. Turning to his loyal friend Gloucester, Lear sighs ‘See how yond justice rails upon Yond simple thief. Hark, in thine ear. "Change places and, Handy-dandy, which is the justice, which is the thief?'"  It is only an accident of history and geography that has put the poor man at the rich man’s mercy. As we have now all seen for ourselves, neither Lear nor any of his men chose to be vagrants.

Is it not, Shakespeare seems to be asking, an outrage to blame the poor for their condition?
 
Farmers were expected to give the royal hunt free access and might have his own dogs confiscated 

King Lear was presented at the royal court at Whitehall on Boxing Day 1606, the day traditionally dedicated to giving help to the poor.

Historian Julia Merritt discovered that King James was giving virtually nothing to the parish poor around his palace at Whitehall. It could hardly have been more pointed.

What exactly led Shakespeare to take the story up in 1606 is difficult to work out. In May 1603, just a few weeks after he had become king, James had announced that he would enforce English forest law and set large parts of the country – the so-called ‘forests’ - aside for royal hunting only. Forests – which might or might not be covered in trees - stood outside normal jurisdictions. They were often places where the poor gathered (as Lear does) trying to make a few pence gathering firewood, or making charcoal or perhaps keeping a pig. Or, of course, doing a bit of poaching.
 
Now James had made it clear he wants these spaces for himself, to indulge his love of hunting.  We can imagine the king on Boxing Day 1606 sitting rather uncomfortably through the play.

Entertainment at court was organised by his Danish queen Anne. Everyone knew that she couldn’t get enough of Shakespeare’s plays. Everyone also knew that she was completely fed up with James’s obsession with hunting. Steal a glance at her. Is she enjoying his discomfort?
 
Listen To Our Full Series

Every series we add to the History Café catalogue is available on our website. You can click the images below or choose to listen on any of your favourite platforms.  


       

View All Episodes
View this email in your browser
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Spotify
Email
Copyright © 2026 History Cafe, All rights reserved.
'Hang, beg, starve...'
15 April 2026
All History Café links
Shakespeare and the Groundlings
The dying Mercutio violently curses both Romeo’s Montagues and Juliet’s Capulets with a line that shocks the audience. ‘A plague on both your houses.’ He says it three times. Plague, as we all know to our considerable cost, is no joking matter. But the boy is right. Duelling among the rich is a disgraceful waste of life and contrary to the Christian teaching we’re all supposed to uphold. But – and here’s the thing that really gets the audience angry – nobody is ever prosecuted
Romeo and Juliet, 1996, directed by Baz Luhrmann, with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes

We’re going back to Shakespeare’s London

We're imagining ourselves at the early performances of his plays.

What we’re discovering – because we now know that most of the first audiences turn out to be poor - is that they give us extraordinary insights into the way London’s working population saw the world in the 1590s and 1600s, when Shakespeare was at work.

In this episode it’s two o’clock in the afternoon and it’s 1595, perhaps one day in the autumn. We’re crossing the fields from the City of London and heading for the former site of Holywell Priory. You can go to see plays in city taverns. But proper theatres are banned in town. Not to worry. The custom-built building called simply The Theatre is conveniently near.

In four years’ time Shakespeare and his co-actor investors will turn up one night and pull it down. They then move it timber by timber to Southwark to rebuild is as The Globe. Something to do with a dispute with the land owner.


#120 'Hang, beg, starve...' - Ep 2 Shakespeare and the Groundlings
 






 
Cartoon from 1665 but the story is very much the same as 1595

Being poor in 1595 is no joke

It’s so cold and wet English harvests failed for four years in a row, 1594-7 causing terrible food shortages. In 1591 people in Sweden were saying that the grass simply never turned green. English soldiers sent to Ireland in 1600 complained that it was too dark to fight.

1601 would be the coldest summer in six centuries. The weather was so bad that people across Europe were talking about witchcraft.

And as if this were not enough, the black death returned yet again, killing an enormous percentage of the weak and the vulnerable, but also young and fit people who had no immunity. Shakespeare’s own son Hamnet died of the plague in the summer of 1596. The 1592-93 plague had killed about 20% of London’s population.

The result of all this was shortage of food and desperate need among the poor. So when Capulet’s tells his 14yr old daughter Juliet ‘hang, beg, starve. Die in the streets,’ the audience shifts uncomfortably.

It's outraged when Romeo sneers at a poor apothecary who won’t hand over an illegal potion: ‘Art thou so bare and full of wretchedness, And fears’t to die? Famine is in thy cheeks. Need and oppression starveth in thy eyes. Contempt and beggary hangs upon thy back.’ When Romeo insists, the apothecary mumbles, ‘My poverty, but not my will, consents.’
'some shall be pardoned and some punished’
- the Prince (Romeo and Juliet)

 

A Students Lamentation... for the rebellious tumults lately in the Citie... for which five suffered death on Thursday 24 July last

The real-life Montagues v Capulets

Romeo and Juliet isn't about rich vs poor, it's a play about a feud between two families. It’s about two factions. And in 1595 that changes everything.

Londoners are all too well aware of the real life Montagues v Capulets feud being played out (to their considerable cost) between the Queen’s Chief Minister Robert Cecil and the wealthy Lord Mayor of London, John Spencer.

In the face of severe food shortages caused by failed harvests the mayor has set the price for essentials like fish and butter. So when in 1595 some young apprentices argue with women profiteering from fish and butter sales, the mayor reprimands but doesn't punish the men.  Within a ridiculously short time however the Privy Council (Cecil’s domain) has intervened to try the young men at the highest court in the land, the Star Chamber. And when their mates raise a protest, the young men are hanged. (Sound familiar?)

At a time of severe climate crisis and food shortage, feuds like those of the Montagues v Capulets, the Cecils and their opponents, were making the daunting task of feeding the poor yet more difficult.

Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet points the finger at factions and feuds as a luxury nobody can afford. It was time the rich – and above all the Cecils – stopped being so blind to the needs of those around them.
The Italian fashion for duelling taken up by the English rich from the 1570s was a scourge

Yet another luxury society cannot afford

One of the most shocking elements in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is the spectacle of lads being killed in duels in the street. We watch young lives thrown away over meaningless points of honour.

This was the new fad among the rich. There were actual academies in London to teach rich young men the art of fighting with rapiers - slender duelling swords that would be completely useless in a battle.
 
The new-fangled Italian code of honour was supposedly all about courtesy. But in practice it translated into burbling a string of honeyed words that concealed your true meaning. And at court it meant using half-truths and lies to double-deal your way to promotion and to destroy your enemies.

As a contemporary writer, George Puttenham, puts it, ‘the credit and profession of a very courtier is in plain terms cunningly to be able to dissemble.’ Well he would know – in 1570 he was wrongly accused of hatching a plot by – well, you guessed – the Cecils. Dissembling was the Cecils’ speciality.

But – and here’s the thing that really gets our audience angry – nobody is ever prosecuted for killing someone in a duel.

Here we are in 1595, when poor young apprentices are being hanged for arguing over the price of a fish. But the rich can commit murder in the streets and get away with it.

As the Prince says in Romeo and Juliet ‘some shall be pardoned and some punished.’ It’s an outrage.
 
Listen To Our Full Series

Every series we add to the History Café catalogue is available on our website. You can click the images below or choose to listen on any of your favourite platforms.  


       

View All Episodes
View this email in your browser
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Spotify
Email
Copyright © 2026 History Cafe, All rights reserved.