What Wars? What Roses?

- Episode 04-

Murder in the Tower

Murder in the Tower
3 April 2024
All History Café links
NEW SERIES What Wars? What Roses?
[painting] Elizabeth Wydeville (Woodville), queen to Edward IV

That old chestnut - common-girl-denies-king-until-he-marries-her

During the 1460s, a story circulated widely – in England and abroad. It tells how the (famously debauched) young King Edward falls in love with a common girl, Elizabeth Wydeville. In some versions she sits alluringly under a tree as the king passes. She begs his help with a legal case she is fighting against a cruel landowner who is trying to seize her property.

The king falls hopelessly for her. But she refuses to become his mistress. In fact she holds out on him until he agrees to marry her. So in the spring of 1464 the king slips away from his companions, and rides to the village of Grafton in Northamptonshire, Elizabeth Wydeville’s home. There, on May Day, 1 May, king Edward secretly and romantically marries her.


[painting] possible portrait of Anne Boleyn, although Henry VIII destroyed all images of her
 
Fans of Anne Boleyn – who secretly married Henry VIII 69 years later – will note the similarities. The fact is that common-girl-denies-king-until-he-marries-her was just a common folk tale in the late medieval period.

In Anne Boleyn’s case we know - from documents that Henry VIII sent to Pope Clement in 1527 - that it was not true. Boleyn had not refused to sleep with the king until he married her (as we discover in our series Henry VIII: the king, his wife, his lover, the French). But the story persisted because it later became useful for religious reasons.

 
[illustration] Warwick on the 15th Century Rous Roll, looking quite full of himself

Warwick had two kings prisoner in the Tower

Having helped Edward IV to the throne, Warwick decided he didn't like being marginalised by the Queen's Wydeville family. And he began spreading the story that the Queen's mother Jacquetta, was a witch and had used sorcery to compel Edward to marry her daughter.  In the 15th century you could be imprisoned for life – or even (if you were a poor woman) burned - for witchcraft. Now, they said, they had found … well … a couple of, er, lead dolls near the family home at Grafton. And that … they said … proved, it.

Warwick captured Edward IV in his bed on his way back to London. Briefly he had two kings (like two popes!) - Henry VI and Edward IV - prisoner in London. 

As historian Thomas Penn concludes, Warwick’s intention was not so much to put Henry VI back on the throne, as ‘nothing less than the total destruction of the queen’s family.’


#95 Murder in the Tower - Ep 4 What Wars? What Roses?




[cartoon] Nick Anderson

ChatGPT wrote this joke for us in 10 seconds based on this episode:

Q: Why did the Earl of Warwick want to become a weather forecaster during the Wars of the Roses?
 
A: Because he was always trying to predict which way the winds of political fortune would blow, but it seems he got caught in a storm of his own making!

 
Murder in the Tower - a Yorkist family tradition

 

[painting] George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence, by Lucas Cornelisz de Kock (1495-1552) 

Murder in the Tower - A Yorkist family tradition

Edward IV’s second reign, from 1471-83, underlined how difficult it had become to govern the English nobility. In 1477 the older of Edward’s two brothers, George, Duke of Clarence, was arrested on charges of plotting (for a second time) to overthrow his brother. In 1478 he died in prison.

The traditional story goes that he was drowned in a butt of malmsey, a sweet wine from Madeira. Rumours at the time were quite different. It had been Malvasia, a sweet wine from Greece. 
 
All we know for certain is that after a rigged show trial Clarence had not been executed publicly but secretly, in the Tower. Exactly how, we have no idea. It was just like the murder of Henry VI, seven years before, also under Edward IV. 


[still from animation] The little princes sent to the Tower to await the coronation of young Edward V

So when, five or six years after Clarence’s murder, Richard III killed the princes in the Tower, he was just doing what the Yorkists habitually did. Call it a family tradition.
[animation] Richard III by Natasha Orlova, here with one of the two princes sent to the Tower

Richard III by William Shakespeare is NOT historical

Shakespeare, in his play Richard III, dramatizes an exchange between Clarence and the two men sent to murder him. Their justification for killing him, they say, is that he’d broken God’s law by murdering Henry VI, and Clarence quite rightly says his brother Edward IV was to blame for that!

Clarence urges them to go to his other brother Richard. ‘Who shall reward you better for my life than Edward will for tidings of my death.’ They then break the news that it was Richard who sent them. But in real history, of course, Richard had nothing to do with it.
 
Historian Thomas Penn suggests that the one really pushing for Clarence’s death may have been the Queen, Elizabeth Wydeville. After all, Clarence and Warwick had murdered her father and one of her brothers, and accused her mother of being a witch (see above).


[painting] Penance of Jane Shore by William Blake

After Edward IV's death his mistress, Jane Shore, is accused of sorcery by Richard III who blames her for his scoliosis (not that he used that word). However the charge was dropped to one of harlot. Shakespeare gets this right!
View All Episodes
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Spotify
Email
Copyright © 2024 History Cafe, All rights reserved.